ENVIRONMENTAL CASE

for BITCOIN

ENVIRONMENTAL CASE

for Bitcoin

Explore a curated collection of articles, videos, and research that dive into Bitcoin’s environmental impact, energy use, and sustainability efforts.

Image

“Energy use is not a flaw of Bitcoin—it’s what gives it strength, security, and independence.”

– Lyn Alden

Image

“Energy use is not a flaw of Bitcoin—it’s what gives it strength, security, and independence.”

– Lyn Alden

Featured

Skull of Satoshi

The Skull of Satoshi Backfires

June 23, 20254 min read

The Skull of Satoshi Backfires: A Lesson in Bitcoin, Truth, and Energy

In 2023, a dramatic symbol of protest emerged—an ominous sculpture titled the Skull of Satoshi, forged from flaming steel, designed to terrify the public into turning away from Bitcoin. Backed by a $5 million marketing blitz from Ripple’s Chris Larsen and promoted by GreenpeaceUSA, the campaign was meant to paint Bitcoin mining as an environmental villain. But instead of tarnishing Bitcoin’s image, it triggered something entirely different: a shift in public perception—starting with the artist himself.

Ben Von Wong, the sculptor behind the skull, had originally signed on believing what many do at first glance: that Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work (PoW) is an energy-guzzling, planet-burning monster. The statue was crafted as a dark, satirical indictment of Bitcoin, meant to stir outrage and fuel an anti-PoW narrative. But as Von Wong dove deeper into the research, he realized something stunning: he’d been misled.

“I made the Skull believing Bitcoin mining was a simple black-and-white issue,” Von Wong later admitted. “I've spent my entire career trying to reduce real-world physical waste, and PoW felt intuitively wasteful. Of course, I was wrong.”

That confession struck a nerve in both the art world and the Bitcoin community. Because it didn’t just expose a change of heart—it exposed a deeper truth about Bitcoin’s relationship with energy. The truth that Bitcoin mining is rapidly becoming a force for good in the global energy system.


The Real Environmental Story of Bitcoin

For years, Bitcoin’s detractors have pointed to its energy consumption as evidence of moral and technological failure. The claim is simple: “It uses too much electricity.” But this claim leaves out the crucial context of how and where that electricity is used.

Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work mechanism rewards miners for securing the network with computational power. But miners are profit-driven, and cheap energy is their lifeblood. And what’s the cheapest energy on Earth? Surplus, stranded, or renewable energy that would otherwise go unused or be curtailed. That’s why Bitcoin mining operations increasingly crop up next to hydroelectric dams in rainy seasons, wind farms in off-peak hours, and natural gas flares that would otherwise burn into the sky, wasted.

This isn’t speculative—it’s documented. Studies show that over 50% of Bitcoin mining is now powered by renewable or low-carbon energy sources. And in many cases, Bitcoin acts as a financial bridge, making renewable energy projects more viable by monetizing their excess power. Far from being a “climate villain,” Bitcoin has emerged as a surprisingly effective grid stabilizer and green tech accelerator.


The Ripple Effect of Propaganda

Chris Larsen, a co-founder of Ripple Labs and longtime critic of Bitcoin, provided the $5 million bankroll for the Greenpeace campaign. Unsurprisingly, Ripple’s token XRP runs on a different consensus mechanism, one far more centralized and closed. While the goal of Larsen’s campaign may have been to position XRP as the greener alternative, it revealed more about marketing desperation than environmental concern.

And ironically, it may have backfired.

The Skull of Satoshi became a meme—used by Bitcoiners not as a symbol of shame but as a badge of honor. Memes, after all, are the native language of the internet, and no amount of corporate cash can control what the meme lords decide to make iconic. In the end, it wasn't Bitcoin that looked ridiculous—it was the anti-Bitcoin campaign itself.


Transparency Always Wins

The artist’s public change of heart is powerful because it came from someone outside the Bitcoin community. Von Wong was a self-described environmentalist, someone concerned with tangible waste and climate impact. When he chose to look deeper—beyond the headlines, beyond the press releases—he found nuance, and ultimately, redemption.

This is why platforms like Relai have stayed steadfast in their Bitcoin-only mission. No altcoin distractions. No centralization games. Just self-custodial, sovereign Bitcoin. Because truth, like proof-of-work, doesn’t rely on persuasion. It reveals itself over time—through transparency, openness, and permissionless participation.

When it comes to Bitcoin’s energy use, the truth is increasingly impossible to ignore: Bitcoin is a net positive for energy grids, a driver of renewable innovation, and the most transparent financial system the world has ever known.

So yes, the tide is turning.

The next time someone throws the Skull of Satoshi in your face, just smile—and remind them even the artist saw the light.


Shout out to BullishBTC.com — where we teach Bitcoin not just as tech, but as truth. Sound money. Self-custody. Freedom.

Back to Blog

Introducing Soluna’s Project Dorothy: A Wind-Powered Data Center in Texas

Bitcoin Mining: Separating Fact from Fiction

Bitcoin's Energy Consumption and its Environmental Impact

How Bitcoin Can Expand the Grid in Africa with Erik Hersman

Turning Garbage into Bitcoin with Adam Wright

Builders + Innovators Summit 2021: Crusoe Energy

+1 (361) 314-2121

OUR GOAL

Our goal is to educate others on the value of owning Bitcoin from both a financial and humanitarian perspective.

© 2025, BullishBTC. All rights reserved.